Asterix NZ

'Take on Caesar' Movie

Background

After a historic lunch in 1994, Albert Uderzo agreed that an Asterix film starring real people could be made. 5 years later, Asterix and Obelix take on Caesar was released. At the time it was the most expensive French film ever made - but it all paid off, breaking French box office records with 9 million people paying to see the film alone.

Uderzo in one interview was highly complementary of the movie based on Goscinny and his creation:

Oh, I liked it, of course! I'm not saying that just to make you happy, if I didn't like it, I would have said so. I like this movie because all the stops were pulled to make it a great movie. And this is exactly what the French critics complained about. It's quite the contrary with American movies, where this is forgiven - in France, it's not considered to be a good thing to make films with big budgets. I don't know why, that's just the way it is. We are a Gaulish race with extraordinary qualities but we also have certain faults, such as that one.


The critics really tore this movie apart, while they should have been more supportive, if only for the fact that the producers managed to get enough money to make it a great movie. This is certainly not an intellectual movie, and it wasn't like the one honored at the last Cannes Film Festival, far from it! It was a movie that just tried to be as good as American movies.


I'm very happy because it was a bit of a crazy challenge to use actors, especially well known actors such as Gerard Depardieu and Christian Clavier, to play these little characters that everyone knows only from drawings. I don't think the people who saw it were disappointed, I haven't received any letters saying, "No! This was treason! ". Quite the contrary, everyone seems to agree that it was a good movie, and they enjoyed seeing it. But there are people who are never happy...

 

In 2000, under the guidance of Terry Jones of Monty Python fame, the movie was dubbed into english and is available on DVD.


Asterix and Obelix as Legionaries
Julius Caesar and Tullius Destructivus
More Images from Asterix and Obelix take on Caesar can be found here.

Plot
Roman Detritus has plans to overthrow Caesar and become ruler of Rome. But first, he needs the Magic Potion brewed by a certain Druid in a certain Gaulish village. He captures Getafix and uses his new strength from the potion to arrest Julius Caesar. In order to rescue their Druid, Obelix dresses up as a Legionary and pretends to have captured Asterix. But all doesn't go to plan...

Cast

Christian Clavier as Asterix
Gerad Depardieu as Obelix
  • Michel Galabru: Vitalstatistix
  • Claude Piéplu: Getafix
  • Daniel Prévost: Prolix
  • Pierre Palmade: Cacfonix
  • Laetitia Casta: Panacea
  • Arielle Dombasle: Mrs Geriatrix
  • Sim: Geriatrix
  • Marianne Sägebrecht: Impedimenta
  • Gottfried John: Julius Caesar
  • Jean-Pierre Castaldi: Caius Bonus
  • Jean-Roger Milo: Fulliautomatix
  • Jean-Jacques Devaux: Unhygenix


See the Internet Movie Database for complete cast list.

English Voice Over Cast
  • Asterix: Olaf Wijnants
  • Obelix: Terry Jones
  • Detitrus: John Duval
  • Vitalstatistix: Douglas Blackwell
  • Getafix: John Baddeley
  • Prolix: Harry Barrowclough
  • Caesar: Peter Marinker
  • Crismus Bonus: Rodney Beddal

Review

After too many years of waiting, the disc was finally in my Region 4 DVD player! The first live action Asterix movie starts promising enough. The tip of a menhir slowly rises up as Asterix and Obelix are revealed walking up a slope. It is an image directly out of the Asterix comic strips. These are the characters we know and love, and played convincingly by Christian Clavier as Asterix and Gerad Depardieu as Obelix. Sadly, this note perfect opening is not sustained, and we are left with an enjoyable, but muddled film.

The blame for this muddle lies firmly in the film's structure and plot. Existing Asterix stories have been combined before to create movies, most successfully in the cartoon movie Asterix vs Caesar where the plots of Gladiator and Legionary were melded seamlessly. But in Take on Caesar are whole heap of Asterix stories have been sploshed into the script's cauldron and this is to the film's detriment.

The film opens ala Asterix the Gaul where Caesar has just conquered Gaul, but is unaware one small village of indomitable Gauls still holds out against the invaders… then it segues into Asterix the Legionary with Panacea arriving in the village complete with much of the book's early scenarios about Obelix being smitten with her… then it's the dark and stormy night from Asterix and the Soothsayer where Prolix the fortuneteller arrives and cons everyone except Asterix… then the film borrows the Roman taxpayer idea from Asterix the Cauldron, the Gauls take the money, the soothsayer runs off with it… Getafix goes to the Druid conference in the forest of Carnutes and gets captured in a scene straight out of Asterix and the Goths, Obelix goes to the Roman camp dressed as Obulus the Legionary as in the same story, Asterix and Getafix are held prisoner as in Asterix the Gaul and forced to make the magic potion… then the film leaves the establish Asterix stories behind and comes up with a ridiculous third act… before finishing the film with Obelix's birthday and roman army present from Obelix and Co!!!

The end result is indeed an episodic, muddled film without a throughline. The danger of incorporating all these plot elements from the Asterix stories is that they can only be used in passing and the best gags from the various Asterix stories are left on the wayside. The soothsayer doesn't relate to the main plot and only seems included for some cheap gags - he feeds Asterix some "magic mushrooms" and brainwashes him into thinking Obelix is Caesar. This results in a very unfunny fight between an out of character Asterix and Obelix. He uses this diversion to steal the taxpayer's Gold and neither the gold nor the soothsayer is referenced again. Panacea is not at all central to the main plot and her storyline could have been omitted entirely, but it does allow some cute moments. But we are left with a story that is unsure about what story it wants to be. The film would have been much stronger if it concentrated on a few stories, rather than cherry picking a whole lot.

But I do not wish to attack the first two thirds of the film too harshly. The village and fight scenes are played to perfection, and are exactly what you'd imagine it would be like to see these 2Ds scenes from the books played in 3D. The invented sequence where Obelix is pretending to be Obelus is rather humorous. He becomes Lucius Detritus (a Roman leader plotting to topple Caesar) personal bodyguard and then promoted to chief centurion. Asterix shouts in vain for Obelix to stop acting, but Obelix never can quite hear what he is saying… these scenes are played brilliantly by Gerard. However, the joke wears thin in one of the set pieces of the film where Asterix is forced to navigate filled with snakes, lions, crocodiles (or "handbags" as Asterix calls them!) cockroaches, elephants… and Asterix gets out of these situations no thanks to Centurion Obelix, to the audience's mild amusement… but then Asterix is finally attacked by a man monster (this thing has to be seen to believed!) that has absolutely no place in the Asterix universe. The makers don't know when to stop.

It is the invented plot of the third act that grates the most. Detrius now has the magic potion, and Getafix tells us that if the village is to be saved they need unicorn milk from his Great Grandfather Methelusix. They find a small man with a long white beard and mushrooms growing on his face who asks them riddles… a very bizarre scene with no comedic pay off… but it gets worse. Once this milk has been added to the potion, Asterix and Obelix multiply, creating a huge army of Asterixs and Obelixs! This did put a small smile on my face, but it seemed too over the top and fantastical for the world of Asterix. It seemed to me a cheap way to end the film, flying in the face of the subtle humour the Asterix series is famous for.

But enough of the negatives, lets have some more positives by Tautatis! The film looked visually very rich, with some nice special effects and all the characters translated well from their comic book origins.

I can't praise the English dubbing enough. You can be sure of quality when Monty Python's Terry Jones is in charge. Combined with Gerard's wonderful physicality, his voicing of Obelix makes the character the film's highlight. The synchronization of the characters' words to the lips is near faultless. In comparison with the literally translated English subtitles, the English dub is far superior. It can be likened to Anthea Bell and Derek Hockridge's translation of the Asterix comic books - they make up their own puns and gags in the spirit of the French original when a literal translation will not do. One scene I particularly appreciated was at the beginning of the film was when Caesar addresses his troops and the "loudspeakers" repeat what he said. While the French version seemed to repeat exactly what he said, Jones added in some of his own cleverness. Caesar: The might of Rome is unstoppable! Loudspeaker: Caesar says a lot more meaningless drivel which you'll all have to go "hurrah, hurrah, hurrah" Legionaries: Hurrah, Hurrah, Hurrah! It was a moment of Monty Python esque humour I just loved, and the dub is a brilliant marriage with the humour of Asterix.

I think the film's sequel Mission Cleopatra is superior in many ways, with a tighter more focused storyline and better gags.

Take on Caesar deviates too far from the spirit of Goscinny and Uderzo for my taste, but it is still an enjoyable romp that will put a smile on your face.

 


Asterix NZ User Review

Maciek sends in this excellent review: "Well it was different than the Asterix comic books.

One think they made excellent in this movie is the music and in my opinion they made a good job with the decorations : Roman Camp, Village etc. were well done. Instead of trying to make costumes and the “ancient world” look like the comics, they were trying to do it more “Historical” but I guess it was good idea.

Many Characters weren’t just like they are supposed to :

  • Asterix isn't himself in some scenes acted very different than the one from the comics. There were some moment’s were his was teasing Obelix (for example in one of first scenes made fun of him because he still believes that the “Sky will fall on his head”) and was annoying couples of times.
  • Obelix character was done slightly better but still not exactly the "Good Old Obelix" we know from the comics. He’s love to Panacea was shown different as in the comic stories and sadly wasn’t funny at all.
  • Dogmatix was okay but in some moments It realy looked like he was Asterix's Dog, not Obelix's.
  • Getafix was shown properly.
  • Vitalstatistix has some funny moments (They didn’t forget about the shield gag!) but his character wasn’t realy shown interesting like the rest , and Impedimenta looked realy different and didn’t act like the one from the comics.
  • Cacofonix and Geriatrix were only appearing in some gag scenes and didn’t do much for the plot but they were shown Excellent ,funny and most memorablyl. Comparing to the rest they truly look and acted like they did in the comic. In this movie Geriatrix's wife actually realy cares about her husband… Which is a little different from comics, but funny (Yes, scene were Geriatrix run to face some Romans and she chases after him yelling “Please don’t! You're not 80-years old any more” Was truly hilarious).
  • One more character who looked excellent like in the original was Tragicomix but his personality was different and he actually was a Jerk.
  • Tullius Destructivus ddin't seem to be based on any of Centurions from the Comics but was funny and Roberto Benigni really *shined* with his comedic talent.

As for the Plot it wasn’t bad but I think they would have done a better job if they make a adaptation of one of the stories instead taking various plot’s and Ideas (Script look like a bizzare combination of "Asterix the Gaul", "Asterix and the Goths", "Asterix the Legionary" and "Asterix and the Soothsayer" and there were some similarities to the “Asterix and the Cauldron” since Asterix and Obelix rob the Tax-Box in this one as well) and puting it into one. Some scenes like when Obelix was trying to give a Menhir to Panacea as a gift or when Prolix The Soothsayer (yep, he’s in the Movie as well) was trying to tell the future just wasn’t funny as they are supposed to.

But of course there were some truly good and funny moments like the fish fight or Gauls and Romans fight. And ofcource Roberto Brnighi have some wonderful moment's and make's the movie spin.

Badly some NEW ideas were realy not good and I would even dare to say “Stupid” : Romans trying to hurt Asterix with a gigantic Rock on the start of the movie and it appears Getafix's Grandfather is living in a cave under the village and owns the *Magic Unicorn Milk* which gives power to duplicate people… I really hate this idea.

Any way “Asterix and Obelix Take on Cesar” have some good moments and Jokes, and if somebody is a fan of Roberto Benigni they must see this one, but it isn’t as clever and funny as the comics and many fan’s will be probably disappointed. Luckily two years letter they did the much better movie ("Asterix and Obelix Mission: Cleopatra”). "


If you would like to add your thoughts on the movie like this reader please contact me.

Buy the Movie

  • Region: 2
  • Special Feature Information:
    ° Original Theatrical Trailer
  • Aspect Ratio: 2.35 Wide Screen
  • Available Audio Tracks: Dolby Surround 2.0
  • Main Language: English
  • Disc Format: DVD 5

Purchase Asterix and Obelix Take on Caesar on DVD